3 ms·
Well, because it's a Vue component?
by algorithm_dk 8y ago
Well, because it's a Vue component?
- TekMol 8y agoWhat is Vue specific about it? Looking through the code, I don't see anything.
- algorithm_dk 8y agoIt's a Vue component, how is that not Vue specific? - https://github.com/runkids/Imagvue/blob/master/src/imagvue.js https://github.com/runkids/Imagvue/blob/master/src/imagvue.j...
- tomelders 8y agoBut what advantages does a Vue component offer over just doing the same thing with CSS? It's not going to be any more performant because it's not addressing a part of the rendering engine that Vue has any influence over. And you're not saving keystrokes because you've still got to instantiate the component and pass values to the props. All it does as far as I can tell is abstract away something that's trivial to do manually.
- mahesh_rm 8y agoVue components are structured in such a way (props, methods, data, computed properties, etc.) which is the same of the file you can find within the SRC folder of the project.
- tomelders 8y agoYeah but why? It's just applying CSS. You set the props, it applies those props as CSS. Why not cut out the middle man and just apply the css directly? And why is lazy loading bundled in? What's that got to do with image processing?
- algorithm_dk 8y agoWhy not cut out the middle man and just apply the css directly Well one could extend this and argue that there's not need for frontend frameworks as you can manipulate the dom directly. Two way data binding is awesome. I have no idea about the lazy loading. And yeah, it's "kind of image processing".
- tomelders 8y agoNo. It makes sense to use a library that implements a VDOM and efficient Dom Diffing because that's hard to implement yourself. And there is no need for front end frameworks at all. They should be avoided entirely. And two way data binding is for fools.
- algorithm_dk 8y agoWell, if you think that, why are you arguing over a submission about a component for one of those frameworks? You think it's useless just because you don't use something like Vue? I'm not sure if you're trolling or not at this point.
- tomelders 8y agoYou don’t have to use Vue as a framework. You can opt just to use the view layer as a library.
- mockingbirdy 8y agoVue implements a vdom, but never mind. This comment is so subjective and unsubstantiated that it hurts the reputation of HN of having high quality comments. > And two way data binding is for fools. Pretty sure that this is against the HN guidelines. Please read them [1]. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- tomelders 8y agoI wasn't saying "don't use Vue", I was saying there are good reasons to use a view layer library, and I used "VDOM" as a relevant example specifically because Vue implements one. And two way data bindings are the best way to make a code base inscrutable. I'll put it another way. Wise developers avoid two way data bindings.
- ic4l 8y agoNothing special here, just css filters. blur(0px) contrast(100%) brightness(228%) grayscale(25%) hue-rotate(151deg) opacity(100%) invert(0%) saturate(100%) sepia(0%) drop-shadow(rgb(84, 191, 142) 16px 16px 10px) https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_filter.asp https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_filter.asp
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]