3 ms·
The rationale is that you call Lewin ex-Mossad with no evidence at all, and you allege had a part in 9/11 when the FAA documents actually suggest he tried to fi
by nir 16y ago
The rationale is that you call Lewin ex-Mossad with no evidence at all, and you allege had a part in 9/11 when the FAA documents actually suggest he tried to fight the hijackers and was stabbed to death.
- borism 16y agoI don't see him suggesting he was on the hijackers' side. As to Mossad, considering he was Sayeret Matkal officer it's not that far fetched. It's not that big of a difference anyway.
- nir 16y agoActually, I think saying Lewin was "an ex-mossad Sayeret Matkal expert who "coincidently" was seated right next to the terrorists who flew Flight 11 into the WTC" followed by "The US people must demand a new 9/11 investigation" suggests exactly that. There's a huge difference between being an officer in an elite unit during your army service and being a spy.
- borism 16y agospy? now where did anyone suggest that? I think you're trying to guess too much into what other people think. Maybe you should concentrate more on known facts and analyze whether anything interesting can be obtained trough piecing them together.
- nir 16y ago>"spy? now where did anyone suggest that?" When OP said Lewin was "ex-mossad"? When you suggested being from Sayeret Matkal is "not that big of a difference" from being in the Mossad?