5 ms·
The example implementation loses out on what actually putting it in the language would gain, though: causing an error when forgetting to include next; or break;
by DanHulton 16y ago
The example implementation loses out on what actually putting it in the language would gain, though: causing an error when forgetting to include next; or break;.
- seldo 16y agoI would really love for it to be an error to include neither, but that would be a massively backwards-incompatible change.
- markchristian 16y agoSure, but it could raise an E_STRICT.
- ars 16y agoThat would still be a massively backwards-incompatible change. Lots of people run using E_STRICT.