> Would you call it discrimination to specifically target poor people to receive government aid? Yes. It is called positive discrimination, because the object

> Would you call it discrimination to specifically target poor people to receive government aid? Yes. It is called positive discrimination, because the object of discrimination is advantaged by it. > so it does not appear to be discriminatory. You want to choose the vaccination schedule yourself, now you have to pay a fine (or not receive a benefit: close to the same thing). It is said to prevent harm from occuring, but apparently the person who's making the decision here believes the Finnish schedule (which is 1/2-1/3 of the US schedule in size) is better for them. No choice for the poor, all the choice to the rich. Discriminatory policy if you ask me.