4 ms·
Which version? Because his first version of the proof had an error that he had to go back and fix.
by mmusson 8y ago
Which version? Because his first version of the proof had an error that he had to go back and fix.
- beder 8y agoShe was claiming something more fundamental (and less sophisticated) than that. Nigel Boston and Andrew Granville wrote a review [1] of her book that distills some of the problems with her argument. A sample quote: > In fact, her central theme is that non-Euclidean geometry, and indeed any mathematics related to non-Euclidean geometry, is nonsense. [1]: http://www.dms.umontreal.ca/~andrew/PDF/VS.pdf http://www.dms.umontreal.ca/~andrew/PDF/VS.pdf