4 ms·
Maybe they were being toxic, but it simply seems like they took a little time in the morning to go over things and he chose not to join them. So what should th
by GVIrish 8y ago
Maybe they were being toxic, but it simply seems like they took a little time in the morning to go over things and he chose not to join them. So what should they have done, each staged separate little talks with him to go over everything that was discussed in their morning meetings? Compile meeting notes and send them to him?
It doesn't sound so much like sabotage as it does that he chose to put his head down and eschew the meeting and struggled because of it.
- watwut 8y agoNo, of course not. "We are having coordination meeting at <insert reasinable time and place>" announcement is already fine. Just starting standup when everyone is in office even if he disagree is fine too. The time and place here seem juuuuust coincide with time and place he is least likely to be at. Standups are not supposed to be passive aggresive way to enforce early coming to work either (most coders have flexible time, your process should honor that) nor are they supposed to prevent you to have breakfast with familly or alone in home. And yes, if collegue does nor know info he needs for work, I would tell it to him even if he clearly missed it by his own mistake. I would also tell him that he don't know info because he ignores meetings he should be at. Transparency and open discussion, basically. Otherwise said, you solve it like any other disagreement over something that requires coordination.