It’s a factual statement, but false. As but one example: removing net neutrality only serves established players who can afford to pay for access to each of th

It’s a factual statement, but false. As but one example: removing net neutrality only serves established players who can afford to pay for access to each of their customers. Just try to start a business when it requires separate contracts with (and payments to) each and every ISP in the country. Most of t admin’s drive against regulations has no impact on startup activity whatsoever: the amount of methane released by oil wells, mileage standards, etc. The statement by OP furthers the fallacy of proportional trade-offs between economic success vs environmental and other harms.