> If money is held and invested, its owner is merely acting as a small independent wing of the central bank. While I can agree with the basic premise that the

> If money is held and invested, its owner is merely acting as a small independent wing of the central bank. While I can agree with the basic premise that the rich being richer doesn't necessarily make the poor poorer, I think the issue boils down to where that money is invested and whether that is to the detriment of other people. While money itself is essentially amoral, it can be used in ways that certainly aren't.