2 ms·
No, that isn't double standards. Why would you think it is? Do you think the rule can only be either "regulations are good" or "regulations are bad"? It's not.
by skj 8y ago
No, that isn't double standards. Why would you think it is? Do you think the rule can only be either "regulations are good" or "regulations are bad"?
It's not. The idea of regulations is neither good nor bad - you have to consider them on a case-by-case basis. You especially have to consider the results.
- ur-whale 8y agoI didn't say all regulation was bad. I said "unecessary". I both cases I quoted, I believe we're dealing with unnecessary regulations.
- skj 8y agoUnnecessary regulations are, by definition, bad, since they have cost without benefit. We're not arguing the semantics of the word here - I think it is clear that the people you refer to think net neutrality regulation is both necessary and good.