5 ms·

You didn't set politics aside at all in this post. Your opinions are politically charged, or at least have significant political implications —though I suspect

• foota 8y ago
  That was a fairly factual statement, it seemed?
  • brainwad 8y ago
    Well, in this case the administration is actually introducing regulations, rather than removing them...
    • koolba 8y ago
      I'd say it's more like they're closing a loophole in an existing regulation. Existing pole owners were already required to allow competitors to add their cables. What this does is prevent them from creating indefinite delays to prevent said competitors from actually doing so.
  • matt4077 8y ago
    It’s a factual statement, but false. As but one example: removing net neutrality only serves established players who can afford to pay for access to each of their customers. Just try to start a business when it requires separate contracts with (and payments to) each and every ISP in the country. Most of t admin’s drive against regulations has no impact on startup activity whatsoever: the amount of methane released by oil wells, mileage standards, etc. The statement by OP furthers the fallacy of proportional trade-offs between economic success vs environmental and other harms.