3 ms·
He's talking about the neutrality vs agency of technology, which is largely unrelated to most of the political articles on HN. For context, here is a good threa
by Alex3917 8y ago
He's talking about the neutrality vs agency of technology, which is largely unrelated to most of the political articles on HN. For context, here is a good thread with a bunch of Ph.D. researchers linking to their favorite academic resources on this topic:
https://www.fwdeveryone.com/t/oSUhsJffQNCxSFVBQNCLKA/air-agency-neutrality-algorithms https://www.fwdeveryone.com/t/oSUhsJffQNCxSFVBQNCLKA/air-age...
This thread on technological determinism vs social construction of technology is also very relevant.
https://www.fwdeveryone.com/t/QNW9-XK6RdmoeRtUp4b5eQ/air-seeking-short-introduction-tech https://www.fwdeveryone.com/t/QNW9-XK6RdmoeRtUp4b5eQ/air-see...
Anyway this is what Turner is talking about when he's talking about algorithmic bias and actor-network theory. It has nothing to do with random articles about Trump's immigration policies or affirmative action or whatever, which is most of what gets flagged on HN.
- untog 8y agoI dunno, I've seen a few HN posts about, for example, the Facebook news feed and its connections to the propagation of fake news. That's absolutely connected to the "neutrality" of the news feed (it's an algorithm! Algorithms can't be bad, they're just math!), but will be flagged all the same. It's a shame for many reasons, but not least that it's a fascinating topic.
- dang 8y agoThere have been quite a few major discussions of that. I think people start to flag such a topic when it enters a later stage of repetitiveness. Call it the Snowden effect.