3 ms·
The approach in this article is to give a "technically unimpeachable" definition. It doesn't involve any lies.
by vilhelm_s 8y ago
The approach in this article is to give a "technically unimpeachable" definition. It doesn't involve any lies.
- oska 8y agoMy comment, and I believe the one I replied to, is directed at the first paragraph in this piece, which is about the idea of teaching as 'a process of lying' and one which the author agrees with 'in principle'. I also do not like his suggested definition. It comes across as smartarse-ish and I think most children would feel the same way.