3 ms·
Would you care to elaborate on the long term disaster part?
by bobds 16y ago
Would you care to elaborate on the long term disaster part?
- brudgers 16y agoI was in a similar situation, it was 46/46/8. 46 and 46 were "married" due to their mutual investment. I was the 8. It's what I negotiated to come on board. No vesting. There was casual mention of a purchase. I controlled a third of the company because 46 + 8 could sell. It was a paranoia fest. I had to go in order to save the "marriage." They are still "married" today. And at the time, I would have cashed out on the sale in a New York minute.
- arethuza 16y agoI started typing an answer but it became a rather pointless rant.... even after nearly a decade these things can still make my blood pressure spike.