3 ms·

For a clearer statement from Guy, explaining why he unilaterally shut down the original complaint, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JzG&

• lucideer 8y ago
  > being attacked by RT and George Galloway is a reasonably reliable indicator that you are doing something right Ok this just further proves my point. If you're justifying your actions based on the identity of individuals who criticise them (particularly individuals you've already previously stated your own negative views on), then that's the very definition of bias. If you need to do this to defend your position, personalising and individualising it rather than sticking to objective statements, there's a problem and you are not a neutral party.
  • FireBeyond 8y ago
    To an extent, but it's hardly the first time that any of these people involved have had their fair share of controversy, backroom dealings, being shown to openly and repeatedly lie about the topics they're admin'ing or "neutrally" arbitrating. Hell, half of them are so voluminous in their misdeeds that they got entire subforums dedicated to them on Wikipedia Review (before that place turned into a ghost town inhabited by crazy folk): * http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showforum=44 http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showforum=44