3 ms·
I find the "humans can do it with eyes" argument pretty weak. Humans also have brains, which are doing most of the heavy lifting. With something like LIDAR, you
by mhermher 8y ago
I find the "humans can do it with eyes" argument pretty weak. Humans also have brains, which are doing most of the heavy lifting. With something like LIDAR, you're shifting more of that heavy lifting into the sensors, so that you don't have to go as deep into trying emulate the human brain in processing. It's such an obvious point.
- thfuran 8y agoYeah, a direct a distance measurement is much more straightforward than the integration of all the monocular and binocular depth cues human perception relies on.