4 ms·
> It's pretty clear where Guy stands on this from the outset ... and it's mostly irrelevant. A good Homo wikipediens, like a good judge or journalist or scient
by tetromino_ 8y ago
> It's pretty clear where Guy stands on this from the outset
... and it's mostly irrelevant. A good Homo wikipediens, like a good judge or journalist or scientist, may well have his biases and private opinions, but is supposed to be able to put those initial biases and private opinions aside, impartially delve into the sources, and write a neutral, well-researched article about a subject.
- lucideer 8y agoI agree. My point is that this user has not kept their biases private, they've brought them to the public discussion on arbitration.
- FireBeyond 8y agoRight. And that particular Wikipedian has a long and sordid history, including repeated formal admonishments, for doing precisely _not that_: * http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showforum=44 http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showforum=44
- mirimir 8y agoEven without taking sides, that is over-the-top crazy stuff.