3 ms·
I agree that it's better, but I don't think it's so much better that I'd be willing to pay them even $1 a year for the improvement. It would take them being in
by bmelton 16y ago
I agree that it's better, but I don't think it's so much better that I'd be willing to pay them even $1 a year for the improvement.
It would take them being insanely better, and offering something that I really need (the 'which bookmarks go where' feature is almost it) to entice me into paying for something I'm getting in-built onto my browser that is free.
It sucks for them, really, because even a year ago I'd have happily paid them the money. Cross-browser (Firefox -> Chrome sync) would have been worth it then, as would the segregation of 'personal' bookmarks from my work PC, but at this point, Chrome sync is in place, it's the only browser I use, and what's left just doesn't convince me to give them money.
I wish them well, but they should have been charging years ago really.