3 ms·
Are you saying that people can't be controversial in "not a good way"? I hope not. Whether this applies to Galloway is a matter of popular opinion. Look at Ass
by lobotryas 8y ago
Are you saying that people can't be controversial in "not a good way"? I hope not.
Whether this applies to Galloway is a matter of popular opinion. Look at Assange. First he was hailed as a hero in the West; now he's looked at as a Russian agent.
- mirimir 8y agoUmmm. Parent isn't saying that. They're quoting Guy, who's saying that. Edit: Unless I missed a multiple negative.
- lucideer 8y ago> Are you saying that people can't be controversial in "not a good way"? I hope not. Of course not. I'm just saying that judgement of whether it is in "a good way" or "not a good way" will always be subjective, and representative of a biased viewpoint. Noone is completely unbiased but espousing such a viewpoint publically on a thread about arbitration isn't in keeping with responsibilities of Wikipedia's admins. > Whether this applies to Galloway is a matter of popular opinion. The popularity of the opinion should not be a qualifier for it to make up a part of a Wikipedia aministrator's discourse on non-biased arbitration.