4 ms·
But it is “virtual” projection of the same info (body). There is a difference in the history of the picture shooting but the picture is the same and may falsely
by meshr 8y ago
But it is “virtual” projection of the same info (body). There is a difference in the history of the picture shooting but the picture is the same and may falsely say was it shot in public or in private with the help of photoshop.
So the same picture may be the serious crime or profitable shot for newspaper depending on unclear history or how good you can fake it or what body owner says.
You can’t make something a serious crime if it could be faked.
- tdb7893 8y agoThe justice system is designed to handle these ambiguities, it's literally the job of the system to gather the facts and experts and make a decision. If it gets to the point where you can't tell at all out seems like you would just need a new law that requires you to prove it was in public or get consent (which you should get anyway, even in public). Proving it was in public would be trivial for the case of something like a protest (lots of eye witnesses and security cameras). I guess I'm not seeing the scenario where it will ever be that unsolvable of a problem in society.
- meshr 8y agoYou may find surprising how the system may demand 9 years of prison for a father who made shots of his weakly child here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yury_A._Dmitriev https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yury_A._Dmitriev BTW He is in prison for about 2 years now. You shouldn’t demand the system to protect your privacy because you will pay for it with your money and freedom. You can protect privacy yourself if you will. I gave some examples above when it can happen by accident/stupidity.