4 ms·
As you can see, I respect you more: I spend some of my time to provide links for you as proofs. But nevermind, it's offtopic anyway. And it's not so important f
by EugeneOZ 8y ago
As you can see, I respect you more: I spend some of my time to provide links for you as proofs. But nevermind, it's offtopic anyway. And it's not so important for me to argue about :)
- erkl 8y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_total_number_of_speakers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_total_num...
- EugeneOZ 8y agothx
- jcranmer 8y agoL1 speakers are relatively easy to gauge, since national censuses would provide sufficiently accurate statistics. Accounting for L2 speakers is very difficult, since there's often little-to-no census-level statistics on the matter, and the definition of proficiency for estimates is difficult to ascertain. Order-of-magnitude estimates are roughly the only level you can do. On that matter, there are some languages which are clearly much more common (over twice as common) as second languages than native languages. English, French, Malay, and Swahili are obvious candidates for this: English is a common secondary language, well, everywhere; French is common second language in Africa; Swahili in East Africa, and Malay in Malaysia/Indonesia.
- EugeneOZ 8y agoAnd still erkl did it and you were too lazy.
- menkoinfo 8y agoApakah anda tau keadaan saya di lapangan saat ini ? Apakah ini penting buat anda dan saya harus menjelaskan secara detail, fungsi dan tugas orang yang disekitar anda mungkin tidak bermanfaat buat saya.
- menkoinfo 8y agoYA, ini sangat Baik