4 ms·

How fast is this compared to browser javascript vm "implementations" of WebAssembly?

• monocasa 8y ago
  At least an order of magnitude slower, probably two. It doesn't even implement a JIT yet.
• nine_k 8y ago
  AFAICT WebAssembly VM is implemented in native code in the major browsers (Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Edge). It's pretty fast, and has a pretty limited interface to JS or DOM.
  • monocasa 8y ago
    Native code or not shouldn't matter that much for a JIT. I've heard Cliff Click say in a talk that if he were to write another VM, it'd probably be in something like Java. The memory management of fairly arbitrary graphs like you get in a compiler really benefit from garbage collection, and it's nice to run the compiler sort of through itself to get dynamic profiling for optimization.
    • nine_k 8y ago
      I mean, implementing a WebAssembly VM inside e.g. JVM is both possible and practical, but it's a very different approach from implementing it in native code, let alone any JIT approaches.
      • monocasa 8y ago
        I mean, implementing a JIT is orthogonal to implementing it in another VM. See JITing meta circular evaluators like Jikes or Graal.