3 ms·
This has to be one of the worst comment threads I've seen here. First of all: Fast.ai are a non-profit. There's no ulterior motive here. I think a lot of the c
by syllogism 8y ago
This has to be one of the worst comment threads I've seen here.
First of all: Fast.ai are a non-profit. There's no ulterior motive here. I think a lot of the commenters here are feeling clever "looking for an angle", when there honestly is none.
Secondly, I really can't think who should have accrued more benefit-of-the-doubt than Rachel Thomas. It's just silly to take the point of view expressed here as insincere or motivated reasoning. None of this means you have to agree with the points raised, the predictions made, or the conclusions drawn. Of course. But the snide tone of many of the comments here is really discordant.
Finally, it's a little...revealing, that there's so much discussion of Jeremy here, including comments that seem to assume he wrote the article. I don't even know what to say about that.