3 ms·
I meant more on how that is relevant to free speech. The case you cited seems to be about cannabis.
by ailideex 8y ago
I meant more on how that is relevant to free speech. The case you cited seems to be about cannabis.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- ryanlol 8y agoI'm not really sure. But the ever-expanding scope of the commerce clause is presumably what he refers to as weaponization.
- craftyguy 8y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_of_Atlanta_Motel_v._United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_of_Atlanta_Motel_v._Unit... (note: I am not saying I disagree with a decision to outlaw discrimination, just pointing out the absurdity that the Commerce Clause was 'interpreted' as being the only way to do this [which ultimately resulted in government limiting free speech])