3 ms·
> some "mild facts" are legally considered "harmful, discriminatory, and disruptive." What? I thought the argument from the other end was always to deny these
by ramblerman 8y ago
> some "mild facts" are legally considered "harmful, discriminatory, and disruptive."
What? I thought the argument from the other end was always to deny these were facts. You are saying, yes, they are facts. But they are too volatile so we won't examine them?
- fixermark 8y agoI'm using the quotation marks to indicate quoted opinions. The difference between the two opinions that is significant: one is an opinion in a legal ruling and therefore carries force of law.