4 ms·
Or, just make it easy for the contractor to manage their own affairs. It's not like the heavy burden has to be carried by the company or the worker, we can eli
by everdev 8y ago
Or, just make it easy for the contractor to manage their own affairs.
It's not like the heavy burden has to be carried by the company or the worker, we can eliminate the heavy burden itself.
- eropple 8y agoI think I just agreed with that? What I am saying is that it is all-too-convenient to say "oh, we'll eliminate that heavy burden we are now placing on you" and then, once it is so placed, proceed to do exactly nothing about it because, hey--the owners are happy, and who cares what anyone else thinks once they're happy? (This is one of many reasons why the Ubers of the world are so nasty; they shirk their responsibilities and leave their de-facto employees holding the bag.) To do justice, one must eliminate that heavy burden, and only the ownership class has sufficient political pull to ever really do anything about it--so they need to continue feeling the pain of it until they do.