4 ms·
> general concensus This is a weasel word (as per e.g. Wikipedia:WEASEL). You need to accompany that with a quote at the very least for "two different realitie
by posterboy 8y ago
> general concensus
This is a weasel word (as per e.g. Wikipedia:WEASEL). You need to accompany that with a quote at the very least for "two different realities (...) somehow got into superposition". And even then I wouldn't buy it if the quote was from popular science or by-the-way opinions. Simply because that's a contradiction.
The two slit open phase is described in a wave model and the other phase in a particle. model. But neither is correct at the same time. That's been good enough for me so far. You might as well say both models were correct and somehow get into super position. But how is somehow important. I have never calculated a wave collapse or even began to understand the PSI operator.
I don't think it would lead me anywhere unless taking the slit, or rather the barrier into the equation. But no, you skip ahead and entangle the whole human brain. Excuse me: What?