4 ms·

Even a simple limit would probably help a lot, e.g. “at most one alternate domain” (your main CDN, and not sketchy-analytics.com or unnecessary-ad-malware.net).

• jazoom 8y ago
  Just use one of the many ad/tracking blockers. Websites will still work. Blocks sketchy-analytics.com. Why make this more complex than it needs to be?
  • amiga-workbench 8y ago
    Because when I go to use a website its an interaction between me and them, I never want any third party involvement. Allow requests to subdomains but nothing outside that.
    • arkh 8y ago
      Use noscript then.
      • amiga-workbench 8y ago
        Me using noscript doesn't make a dent in the usage patterns of the public at large and it doesn't inform others that there is a better way to browse. Without any decent weight behind it, there would be no incentive for people to build their software to actually respect the user and they would continue serving a broken application. Much like browsers slowly boiling site owners by displaying sites as insecure if they don't have any encryption, a similar effort could be made to stop websites handing visitors around like the town bicycle.
        • makecheck 8y ago
          Yes, “shaming” would be a relatively easy improvement too. Browsers should feel free to display big, red, scary-looking logos like “this page load has consumed an unusually-large portion of data/battery/whatever”.