> The tone of your phrasing suggestions specifically that capitalism is directly correlated with fraud. If you didn't intend to make this suggestion, I can unde

> The tone of your phrasing suggestions specifically that capitalism is directly correlated with fraud. If you didn't intend to make this suggestion, I can understand your consternation to my rebuttal. But not enough to not be defensive about your reading, it seems. > To my point in that article, the 'evidence is everywhere' as illustrated by the broad availability of information to support my claim. Oh. That's not a metric I find compelling.