3 ms·

I mean, if you're just reducing the content even further, just request that they make the reduction possible server-side and everybody wins.

TeMPOraL 8y ago
I was more thinking about e.g. running a script to fetch 3 different lightweight sites, run some personal code on it and combine the data. If the script would spend 99.9% of its time waiting on IO because of "human speeds", I wouldn't be too happy. That said, I would be willing to bite the bullet and accept speed limits across the board if it resulted in lean web.
- cheezymoogle 8y ago
  I think this is why batch jobs and crontabs exist. Just do what the BBSes used to do for syncing--wait until anti-peak-time and then let loose.
- JetSpiegel 8y ago
  I achieve this with an RSS reader, in my case Miniflux. Runs on a RPi under my TV and I stay well below my 300MB data cap, while consuming dozens of news sources.
  - voltagex_ 8y ago
    Which news sources? How did you find the ones that still provide RSS? How much of it do you actually read?
    - JetSpiegel 8y ago
      I read virtually all of them. Most of them provide RSS feeds, some are a bit hidden but it's Googlable. I started with the basics BBC, NYT, Guardian, The Intercept for general news, The Conversation for science news without sensationalism, and some tech blogs. Then I just read most of it, and follow some links to find new sources. Most of the times news start with "As reported by X", or just a link, so you can discover new sources like that. You can also browse HN (and n-gate for the highlights) and Reddit to discover new sources. If you add so much you can't keep up, remove some, or change the feeds into section feeds. Most online newspapers provide them. I miss Yahoo Pipes, and have yet to find a simple hosted alternative. There is also RSS Bridge for sites without feeds (Twitter, Facebook), but I still haven't found the time to set it up. You can also add paywalled sources to read the headlines only. You can mark them as read from the index.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]

TeMPOraL 8y ago

I was more thinking about e.g. running a script to fetch 3 different lightweight sites, run some personal code on it and combine the data. If the script would spend 99.9% of its time waiting on IO because of "human speeds", I wouldn't be too happy. That said, I would be willing to bite the bullet and accept speed limits across the board if it resulted in lean web.

cheezymoogle 8y ago
I think this is why batch jobs and crontabs exist. Just do what the BBSes used to do for syncing--wait until anti-peak-time and then let loose.
JetSpiegel 8y ago
I achieve this with an RSS reader, in my case Miniflux. Runs on a RPi under my TV and I stay well below my 300MB data cap, while consuming dozens of news sources.
- voltagex_ 8y ago
  Which news sources? How did you find the ones that still provide RSS? How much of it do you actually read?
  - JetSpiegel 8y ago
    I read virtually all of them. Most of them provide RSS feeds, some are a bit hidden but it's Googlable. I started with the basics BBC, NYT, Guardian, The Intercept for general news, The Conversation for science news without sensationalism, and some tech blogs. Then I just read most of it, and follow some links to find new sources. Most of the times news start with "As reported by X", or just a link, so you can discover new sources like that. You can also browse HN (and n-gate for the highlights) and Reddit to discover new sources. If you add so much you can't keep up, remove some, or change the feeds into section feeds. Most online newspapers provide them. I miss Yahoo Pipes, and have yet to find a simple hosted alternative. There is also RSS Bridge for sites without feeds (Twitter, Facebook), but I still haven't found the time to set it up. You can also add paywalled sources to read the headlines only. You can mark them as read from the index.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]