8 ms·
A random archive of the New York Times frontpage in 2005 is 300kb. Articles were probably comparable in size. Are you honestly saying that the landscape of the
by cheezymoogle 8y ago
A random archive of the New York Times frontpage in 2005 is 300kb. Articles were probably comparable in size.
Are you honestly saying that the landscape of the internet and/or the staffing needs of the NY Times has changed so drastically that they actually needed a 22x increase in size to deliver fundamentally text-based reporting?
- kazagistar 8y agoI mean, if most of that is a few images, then those images could just be bigger today for nicer screens and faster internet. Not that that is the case.