3 ms·
The abridged version is that they were working on it but the head of Kaiser convinced Nixon that private health insurance was a better option. Fast forward a fe
by koolba 8y ago
The abridged version is that they were working on it but the head of Kaiser convinced Nixon that private health insurance was a better option. Fast forward a few decades and there is too much at stake for the companies providing the care^insurance for a graceful change. Large companies also don't give a hoot because they're able to offer corporate self-insured plans which constitutes a competitive advantage against smaller employers.
My personal opinion is that the ACA was also complete garbage. Either go single payer (or at least an option to buy into a single payer) or don't go at all. The half assed approach we've ended up with is the worst combination as the individual is forced to purchase insurance in a market with perverse incentives on all sides and no real competition.
- improbable22 8y agoThere are lots of other systems besides single-payer (like the NHS grandparent mentions liking) or the US. It isn't some law of nature that anything "in-between" is doomed to failure. For example, read a bit about the Swiss system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Switzerland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Switzerland
- yardie 8y agoThe ACA isn't all bad. One thing it did do was open the market to more providers. Prior to that every state had their own insurance companies (ie. BCBS-FL, BCBS-VA, BCBS-WA). And if you wanted it there were maybe 2-3 companies you could choose from.