> but for 90% of use cases javascript actually makes sense and can be the most performant. This is a weird definition of performant, using more resources to ac

> but for 90% of use cases javascript actually makes sense and can be the most performant. This is a weird definition of performant, using more resources to achieve the same result faster, it seems akin to saying JS is more performant than C if you buy a newer CPU to run the code on. > But the more I've learnt about the benefits of "on the fly" / "just in time" optimising compilers, the more I'm convinced this is the future of computing It's been the future of computing for 30 years, possibly longer.