3 ms·
Which is an unnecessary change and an icon which looks nothing like the other icons so still does nothing to offer "enough design tools to represent this entire
by Avshalom 8y ago
Which is an unnecessary change and an icon which looks nothing like the other icons so still does nothing to offer "enough design tools to represent this entire product family."
- nixpulvis 8y agoComparison: https://imgur.com/a/x7yrzZx https://imgur.com/a/x7yrzZx Is it the lack of an arm you don't like, or the fact it's more flat?
- Avshalom 8y agoI don't exactly dislike the new browser logo (although I think going less circular is dumb) so much as I think it's unnecessary. My bigger issue is that the other 9 logos don't use the same design motif beyond the colors. The browser logo is a "fox" encircling the globe leaving a trail of fire, or speed. This is perfectly fine for a global communications tool named firefox that thinks "purpose meets performance" is it's brand identity. but if you want to use the same design tools for the same brand identity: you need to focus on things that imply performance which none of them do except maybe a rocket. and you need them to evoke each other which, imagine for a second those were all random colored and on your phone's home screen; what about them is thematically unifying?