The idea that there is any synergy with Eats is a classic "bad business decision" based on hoped for benefits with a core business instead of a business that ca

The idea that there is any synergy with Eats is a classic "bad business decision" based on hoped for benefits with a core business instead of a business that can stand on it's own legs. Driver and customer acquisition costs are high enough in their core business, why hemorrhage money in Eats spending to acquire drivers for it? In hopes that keeps some percentage as Uber drivers?