3 ms·
The way I do things, is to treat the cable modem as already compromised and connect it to a router 100% under my control (running Linux) that will perform addit
by armitron 8y ago
The way I do things, is to treat the cable modem as already compromised and connect it to a router 100% under my control (running Linux) that will perform additional firewalling and/or act as a wireless AP. I will never let a border device have any sort of direct access into my internal network.
There is no point in spending lots of time & effort trying to secure half-baked half-open devices that are not under my full control. I will do what I can [or what I'm allowed to do by the usually severely restricted configuration modem panel] but I know the game, there, is already lost. Moreover, the ISP can remotely administer the cable modem and flash anything to it.
A second perimeter that is based on infrastructure I fully configure/control/administer is where I still have a chance.
- vetinari 8y agoThere's a worrying trend (I'm looking especially at you, UPC), where the ISP insists that the CPE device must be in router mode, and not in bridge mode. The UPC's current excuse is, that their devices come preconfigured for DS-Lite and that most customers would be unable to configure their own routers for that. Together with the fact, that you are getting a single /64, it means that you cannot place another router behind their router. (And for IPv4 part of the DS-Lite, no, they don't support PCP).