3 ms·
Might not be that easy because only postgres can take a few hundreds of connections which won't work out if you have a few thousands of serverless functions? No
by tango12 8y ago
Might not be that easy because only postgres can take a few hundreds of connections which won't work out if you have a few thousands of serverless functions? No persistent connection pools.
- somebodythere 8y agoWell, just put the connection logic outside of the main handler so it's shared between invocations! Wait, oops, you have state now.
- rhlsthrm 8y agoRealistically could you do this with Redis or something similar? Not sure about security implications of this though...