3 ms·
The body of the article has some great suggestions, but the headline is clickbait. Lots of low-intensity activity is great for health of course. But if you only
by whack 8y ago
The body of the article has some great suggestions, but the headline is clickbait. Lots of low-intensity activity is great for health of course. But if you only have 3 hours per week to exercise, spending those 3 hours at the gym doing high-intensity exercise, is far better than just taking a leisurely stroll. For people with busy lives, going to the gym provides the best ROI for your time. For an obvious illustration of this, you can see the research done on HIIT vs low-intensity exercises:
http://time.com/4893161/hiit-high-intensity-interval-training-exercise/ http://time.com/4893161/hiit-high-intensity-interval-trainin...
- sinatra 8y ago> But if you only have 3 hours per week to exercise I think the point is that you don’t have only 3 hours in a week. You can bring physical activity in many other things you’re already doing. One minor example that I’m trying to focus on: I go for a walk when I take any phone calls.
- btrettel 8y agoGreat suggestion. I often make calls if I am walking to get dinner. It's also a better use of time than just walking alone.