4 ms·
It wasn't ever photo-realistic. Why bother with realism at all? This looks awesome btw http://www.quelsolaar.com/love/screen_shots.html http://www.quelsolaar.c
by 0xdeadbeefbabe 8y ago
It wasn't ever photo-realistic. Why bother with realism at all? This looks awesome btw http://www.quelsolaar.com/love/screen_shots.html http://www.quelsolaar.com/love/screen_shots.html? There was also a gory black and white and RED game that I can't find right now.
- jackhack 8y agoMadworld? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MadWorld https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MadWorld While no-one would argue that Quake was truly photorealistic, it was as realistic as the hardware of the day would allow at a videogame framerate (30+fps).
- mpax 8y agoI used to own Flight Simulator ‘98. Which proudly stated “photorealistic graphics” on the box. Technically they were correct... all the textures were photos!
- 0xdeadbeefbabe 8y agoThough I never played madworld I continue to wonder if the game play is more exciting because the graphics invite your mind to fill in missing details.