3 ms·
That's terribly oppressive. Honestly no one should be forced to directly support other person child. It must be a voluntary process to be just. The biological p
by kukx 8y ago
That's terribly oppressive. Honestly no one should be forced to directly support other person child. It must be a voluntary process to be just. The biological parents should be financially responsible by default. It seems obvious to me.
- AstralStorm 8y agoVoluntary process? You mean to remove child support laws completely? That would be great for deadbeats of course. The law is so designed as to limit social impact of a missing parent. It is also unethical to bring a child into this world and then leave it just like that, unless you're a proponent of the spartan way which comprised murdering weak. The current child care facilities cannot even support current orphans.
- kukx 8y agoNo, that is not what I meant. I meant that the biological parents should be financially responsible for their child by default. If someone wants to voluntarily take over the responsibility it is fine. But the state should not force you to sponsor someone else biological child as if it was yours. It has nothing to do with funding poor and orphaned children through general taxes, this is a wholly different situation and by the way I'm in favor of that.