3 ms·
You mean compared to the current "unintended" consequences of the majorly imbalanced relationship between employee and employer?
by projektir 8y ago
You mean compared to the current "unintended" consequences of the majorly imbalanced relationship between employee and employer?
- duxup 8y agoI think you're trying to use the wrong reason to address a different issue.
- projektir 8y agoSee my previous post. Employer-employee disbalance is already an issue, and it is worth asking if it wasn't present, if this situation would happen at all. This is not the first and the last problem caused by that disbalance, and for anyone observing, stuff like this is old news. There were the teenagers with drunk selfies, no mob required. Lots of very random stuff can get you fired that does not involve Twitter mobs and it all comes back down to the same thing. Note that the title of the thread is "inducing employers to fire them", and explain to me how that statement makes any sense outside of a very imbalanced relationships. You might disagree with this statement overall, but it is the one I am making.