4 ms·
Do you have a reference? Not doubting it, but I’m curious to know if this is true.
by xevb3k 8y ago
Do you have a reference? Not doubting it, but I’m curious to know if this is true.
- mirimir 8y agoI've also read 20-30%. And I was hoping to see an estimate in the article. They must have the data, right? Edit: And yes, those numbers are looking more like FUD.
- juskrey 8y agoAnecdotal: in last three generations of my family we had three confirmed incidents of this. It's only what we know. Including my own first marriage (I divorced, though it wasn't a secret, since the marriage de facto already did not exist by that time) Not 30% but not 1-2 also..
- hugh4life 8y agohttp://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/false-paternity-isnt-actually-widespread/ http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/false-paternit... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-paternity_event#Rates_of_non-paternity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-paternity_event#Rates_of_n...
- mirimir 8y agoThe first one cites Larmuseau et al. (2016).[0] > The surprising result of these new studies is that human EPP rates have stayed near- constant at around 1% across several human societies over the past several hundred years. But this is based on long term population studies, not "real time" measurements. 0) https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.004 https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.004