3 ms·
To me, foo.where(...) looks a bit cleaner than a function call such as filter(..., foo). But writing foo.skip(4) instead of foo[4:] is just silly. This library
by Juerd 8y ago
To me, foo.where(...) looks a bit cleaner than a function call such as filter(..., foo). But writing foo.skip(4) instead of foo[4:] is just silly.
This library consists of very thin wrappers around functionality that's available out of the box in Python. Are these wrappers worth an extra dependency? I think a cheat sheet for people coming from .NET would be more useful than implementing a similar API.