3 ms·
While ageism is very likely a real problem, the methodology used in this study is problematic. Quote: > “The tech industry is hiring a disproportionately high
by ahmedalsudani 8y ago
While ageism is very likely a real problem, the methodology used in this study is problematic.
Quote:
> “The tech industry is hiring a disproportionately higher ratio of workers than non-tech up until the age of 48—indicating bias does exist that favors younger candidates,” the report states.
It seems like the authors looked at how many people the software industry was employing relative to the rest of the market.
The correct (albeit trickier) approach is to look at ratio of applications to offers, grouped by age. Controlling for other variables would be ideal, but it makes this doubly harder.
The approach taken by the authors (looking at the ratio in the software industry vs. the wider economy) hides too many confounding variables. What if people in software make more money and are able to retire, so they stop seeking work around 50? What if there just aren't as many qualified people 48+ years old compared to other industries since software is a younger field?
Those and other questions are hard to answer when you take the approach taken by the authors.
- adfm 8y agoFolks that are 48 now are some of the first to grow up with PCs in the classroom and are as savvy or more savvy than folks entering the workforce. They're just now finding that folks born after the 2007 introduction of the iPhone are becoming unfamiliar with keyboards, a still very necessary technology. That leads me to think that there's likely a rolling window and that we'll start to see increasing discrimination and exploitation on the other end in a few years time.