2 ms·
> It's essentially impossible to differentiate the two. This sounds like "guilty until proven innocent" logic - maybe we should drown people to prove they're n
by tomnipotent 8y ago
> It's essentially impossible to differentiate the two.
This sounds like "guilty until proven innocent" logic - maybe we should drown people to prove they're not witches. I'm all for a healthy dose of skepticism, but there's a point it passes into fantasy.
- daeken 8y agoNo, it means that making statements about the certainty of this in either direction is foolish and unsupported by evidence.
- akudha 8y agoCompanies quietly fix problems all the time. Why would anyone disclose anything negative if they are not mandated to, by law? Remember when Uber paid off a hacker and kept the hack under wraps? That is just one example. This is not guilty until proven innocent, this is just the way most businesses operate.