4 ms·
> The writer Umberto Eco belongs to that small class of scholars who are encyclopedic, insightful, and nondull. He is the owner of a large personal library (con
by DocTomoe 8y ago
> The writer Umberto Eco belongs to that small class of scholars who are encyclopedic, insightful, and nondull. He is the owner of a large personal library (containing thirty thousand books), and separates visitors into two categories: those who react with “Wow! Signore professore dottore Eco, what a library you have! How many of these books have you read?” and the others — a very small minority — who get the point that a private library is not an ego-boosting appendage but a research tool. Read books are far less valuable than unread ones. The library should contain as much of what you do not know as your financial means, mortgage rates, and the currently tight real-estate market allows you to put there. You will accumulate more knowledge and more books as you grow older, and the growing number of unread books on the shelves will look at you menacingly. Indeed, the more you know, the larger the rows of unread books. Let us call this collection of unread books an antilibrary.
Nassim Taleb in "The Black Swan" on the value of unread books.
- kaybe 8y agoThe questions remains, probably, what it means for a book to be 'read'. I'd posit that that books are only valuable in your possession if you know it - this specific book - exists, maybe even where exactly in your house if you have a lot, and you have a basic idea of the contents. So you have to open them at least once and get a general overview of the index, maybe the illustrations, maybe even a bit more. Is this book still unread? I'd say truly unread books are worthless without a search function, which is not yet well implemented in the physical world.