> Are you suggesting he is not allowed? You misunderstand-- that line comes from shifting the original author's opinion back at his own complaint. The devil's

> Are you suggesting he is not allowed? You misunderstand-- that line comes from shifting the original author's opinion back at his own complaint. The devil's advocate I channeled doesn't really have an opinion of its own. The point is that it's somewhat worth noting that complaining about someone else's complaints hints at self-contradiction. [Aside: I guess sometimes other people use the "devil's advocate" voice for their own opinions? Not in my circles-- it's always used for giving a view that may be contrary (or different) from your own for logical discussions and/or debate.] Certainly I personally have no opinion/say on what he's allowed to talk about. Though I do admit a preference for positive or neutral topics over negative ones.