5 ms·
I'm not sure if it's a "blatant attack on alternative news sites". I think probably people actually have good intentions here rather than some establishment con
by Moodles 8y ago
I'm not sure if it's a "blatant attack on alternative news sites". I think probably people actually have good intentions here rather than some establishment conspiracy. I'm not convinced that regulating social media news is the best policy to focus on, though.
- vowelless 8y ago> I think probably people actually have good intentions here. Everyone thinks that their own intentions are good.
- Moodles 8y agoWhat are you trying to tell me? I'm just saying that my opinion is that I doubt this is some establishment conspiracy to make voters vote for them. I think the MPs are probably just trying to get rid of fake news right now. I certainly don't know how anyone can see this as a "blatant" attack. It certainly doesn't look blatant to me. It is at least plausible that they're trying to genuinely help without malicious intent.
- lesss365 8y agoIt's a term blatantly used for censorship and blanket discrediting of sources of information, whether credible or not. It's popularity began with the Clinton campaign and was quickly adopted by GOP candidates Edit: By "it" I mean "fake news"