I feel like this article should have quoted some lines from the earlier article (which was linked): https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/12/technology/sofi-chief-exe

I feel like this article should have quoted some lines from the earlier article (which was linked): https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/12/technology/sofi-chief-executive-toxic-workplace.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/12/technology/sofi-chief-exe... It goes into much more detail on the circumstances of Cagney leaving SoFi. The "romantically involved with an employee" phrasing in this article makes it sounds like he was just dating an employee. I think that weakens the point that's trying to be made, since many people don't equate "dating an employee" with "sex scandal". The earlier article raises additional concerns suggesting that dating one employee was not the only problem.