3 ms·
for me the #1 thing is the non-standard full-screen behavior, which lets my hit cmd+return and instantly full-screen the window, without any animation or creati
by aroman 8y ago
for me the #1 thing is the non-standard full-screen behavior, which lets my hit cmd+return and instantly full-screen the window, without any animation or creating a second workspace.
- nordsieck 8y agoYou might be interested in spectacle. It's a light weight window manager for os x that will let you do that (and more) with any app. https://www.spectacleapp.com/ https://www.spectacleapp.com/
- aroman 8y agoI use spectacle extensively, that's why I enjoy iTerm' fullscreen feature so much :-)
- reaperducer 8y agoCan't that be accomplished in any macOS terminal by redefining the application's keyboard shortcuts in System Preferences?
- aroman 8y agoIt's not about the shortcut, it's about the behavior. iTerm'a fullscreen behavior works fundamentally differently than the standard macOS fullscreen behavior (no animation, no dedicated space, etc). Much more like spectacle, but hiding the window chrome.
- tern 8y agoTo get this, you need to uncheck "Native Full-screen" in preferences
- reaperducer 8y agoUsing non-standard interface elements and methods is the #1 way to get me to stop using a macOS product. Your program has to be pretty darned special for me to learn a whole new set of muscle memory movements for it. Heck, I about dumped OS X when Apple changed the default application opening method. It used to be that when an application was loading and you switched to another window, the application opened behind what you were now working on. Or if you were working on something and another application in the background opened a window, you only got the jumping icon to let you know. Today, applications can hijack focus pretty much whenever they want, aping one of Windows' most annoying UI features.
- saagarjha 8y agoDon't worry, iTerm does native fullscreen by default.