2 ms·
Can your tell me why it isn't a big deal without framing it wrt to "trump supporters".Surely its possible to look at this without partisan lens. As a regular c
by dominotw 8y ago
Can your tell me why it isn't a big deal without framing it wrt to "trump supporters".Surely its possible to look at this without partisan lens.
As a regular citizen I think its a big deal because
1. It eroded publics confidence in MSM giving rise to alternative/fake news sites.
2. What about Donna Brazile's collaborators. Surely she didn't pull this off all by herself.
3. What were the motivations of collaborators at CNN, why did they do it.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- krapp 8y ago> Can your tell me why it isn't a big deal without framing it wrt to "trump supporters". Can you tell me why you believe it should be a bigger deal than it was? Numerous articles were written about it, someone lost their job, what else do you believe should happen? Can you tell me why you started this non-sequitur thread to begin with? TFA isn't about Hillary Clinton's campaign or the scandal surrounding her having been given advance notice of questions, so why bring it up? >Surely its possible to look at this without partisan lens. It is possible, but partisan politics is inextricably linked to the subject at hand, and the only people still bringing it up are people with a partisan agenda.
- dominotw 8y ago> Can you tell me why you believe it should be a bigger deal than it was? I explicitly stated why I thought it was big deal. >> As a regular citizen I think its a big deal because >> 1. It eroded publics confidence in MSM giving rise to alternative/fake news sites. > what else do you believe should happen? Also addressed this >> 2. What about Donna Brazile's collaborators. Surely she didn't pull this off all by herself. >> 3. What were the motivations of collaborators at CNN, why did they do it. I want answers to those questions. And possibly releasing the debate questions to everyone instead of pretending like they are secret. I really want to know why they are pretending that they are secret when they are not. Regular ppl are just idiots to be fucked with? Merely firing one sacrificial lamb is not enough, why would i possibly care about a multimillonare's job at CNN. More honesty and not taking people for idiots would be a good outcome. You know like a change that would prevent this from happening in future. > Can you tell me why you started this non-sequitur thread to begin with? As I mentioned it many times, this to me was one of those things that "trump supporters" used to discredit the media and create fakenews. CNN never coming clean didn't help the case.